Monday, July 13, 2015
Friday, July 3, 2015
Sustaining Technology Use- Doc Cams
Whether instructors use Skype, other video conferencing technology, a television, or projector screen in a lecture hall, a document camera is essential to science. From experience, while Skyping students living on the opposite side of Florida or in Japan, a document camera was essential in showing students in real time how to perform pertinent mathematics. Similar to Khan Academy and mini lectures on YouTube, with a document camera I can speak and write, use different colors, and students are free to jump in and ask for clarification.
Challenges were evident with technical difficulties, Internet connection, and orientation of the document camera. For me to see the distance students’ calculations and correct them with each step, they would need a document camera. Cost is a challenge, as such technology could run $60 to $70. In person, the challenge is really to fund having the teachers’ document camera in the classroom, equipped with a projector. This technology worked well for me when my chemistry teachers solved problems, way back in 2005.
To foster engagement, I would use this technology for online students as a whiteboard. For example, my Biology students are learning about Punnett squares; I could show them where to write the letters of genetic traits and how to pair them up. For Anatomy and Physiology, I would draw how blood circulates or how water flows in and out of red blood cells. From experience, sure PowerPoints are appealing, but students grasp the concept when they see me writing or drawing in real time, and they've expressed this. In a larger class, like when I was a a student in a chemistry course with 200 people, a document camera enabled everyone to see the teacher’s sketches, and the teacher could indicate alternative ways to solve problems; plus, a microphone can be used so the ones in the back could hear (Bogard & McMackin, 2012).
To sustain this technology, I need access to a document camera and the ability to connect it to a computer and projector, so the IT department would be consulted on the setup. During the lecture, I would conduct an informal discussion or survey of my class and see if writing out the procedures helped more than a PowerPoint. I would invite my dean to see the class dynamics. For my online students, I would conduct a virtual office hour session, use the document camera to aid in a video conference. I would solve problems, draw out concepts, etc., and then report it to my dean for our weekly updates. I would collaborate with other designing faculty on how to sustain this as a technique on further courses, thus revamping office hours, where I just wait for students to email me. By communicating with other professors and IT, we can teach each other and brainstorm ideas and troubleshooting techniques, thus moving away from resistance to an older technology that is still not always used, still seen as relatively new, and may be feared (Laureate Education, 2013).
References
Bogard, J. M., & McMackin, M. C. (2012). Combining Traditional and New Literacies in a 21st-Century Writing Workshop. Reading Teacher, 65(5), 313-323.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2013). Dr. Tony Bates: Overcoming resistance to technological change and sustaining change [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)