Google
Sites is a quick and easy way to create accessible and shareable information
without coding or markup language. It is
as easy as uploading files and attachments and inserting maps, videos,
documents, spreadsheets, photo slideshows, and calendars. Permission settings designate those who are
collaborators, viewers, and owners.
Content within the site is searchable (Google Sites, 2011). Cloud computing enables students and teachers
to upload and store information that is reusable and accessible.
Using
Google Sites for teaching and learning within science provides learners with a
“one-stop-shop” for assignments, announcements, policies, and content specific
to the individual courses. Unlike
institutional LMSs, Google Sites are created by instructors. Just like other online resources, students
are comfortable using websites and would not have to navigate new and changing
LMSs. YouTubeTM videos and podcasts of scientific innovations
and experiments can be quickly uploaded.
In online science courses, students have a tough time understanding
concepts written by instructors, but they could take smaller concepts and
discuss them in groups and then attempt to re-teach that to others. Recorded lectures can also be accessed
through the site. When doing group
projects or even hosting office hours, Hangouts is accessible and the site is
shareable just by copy/pasting the URL.
Benefits of using Google Sites for student engagement surround
collaboration, the ability to upload projects, media, or portfolios for
everyone to see. Open communication,
simultaneous responding, yet allowing the instructor to be a gatekeeper as
students converse are aspects of constructivist learning (Denton, 2012). Challenges
of Google Sites for engaging science students surrounds Internet access and
students checking in on the site for updates.
A challenge can be effectively assessing how students improve
academically via Google Sites (Denton, 2012). Using Google Sites to further engage students
is useful in sharing reflections, having students learn computer literacy in
creating their own pages to teach other students, and establishing a social
media connection, such as TwitterTM.
Rather than having students read and
write papers, groups can collaborate and develop and share wikis, critique them
like the well-known Wikipedia, and then edit the project (Laureate Education,
2011). Learning styles may differ but
generally people can “play around with” websites and maneuver them well.
Blogging
can be done with Internet
access. I use the Blogger app on my
iPhone and iPad to create and respond to blogs.
With Internet access, email notifications alert me as to new comments. Blogging is easily linked to social
networking sites, other blogs, websites, and online platforms. It is easy to direct traffic to the blog. Time consumption is inevitable in
building a presence or following. What
is the brand? What is unique? Does the blogger put time into keeping up with
the posts and being diligent about the reliability and validity of what is
being said? What is the degree of
presence of the blogger to generate interest in the blog? Content
is vulnerable to being taken and reused.
If I am a professor with a novel idea or with content specific to my
course, then posting it for the world to see will leave the content open to
usage without permission.
References
Denton, D. W. (2012).
Enhancing instruction through constructivism, cooperative learning, and cloud
computing. TechTrends, 56(4), 34-41. doi: 10.1007/s11528-012-0585-1
Gaille, B. (2015,
June 4). 16 pros and cons of blogging. Retrieved from http://brandongaille.com/16-pros-and-cons-of-blogging/
Google Sites.
(2011). Google Sites overview. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/sites/overview.html
Laureate Education (Producer). (2011). New
and emerging technological trends for education [Video file].
Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu